OneFootball Editorial Policy
Accuracy, AI Use and Editorial Standards
At OneFootball, we are committed to football journalism that is reliable, transparent and useful for football fans around the world. We are a football content platform that predominantly distributes third-party partner content natively, which is complemented with OneFootball Editorial Content originally created by our in-house teams. Whether we cover breaking or daily news, matches, transfers, write analysis or feature stories, our goal is to display and publish content that meets high editorial standards and earns the trust of our audience every day.
Football moves fast. Trust matters even more because of that. Our editorial approach is built around verification, responsible use of technology, human oversight and clear accountability.
1. Third-Party Partner Content
OneFootball as a content platform works with external partners who publish content directly to our platform through native delivery integrations. Responsibility for the original accuracy of that content remains with the respective publishing partner.
While OneFootball is not the originating publisher of such partner content, we take content quality seriously across the platform. We maintain close working relationships with our partners and have processes in place to reduce the risk of inaccuracies, improve quality control and address errors when they are identified.
Where issues are reported or detected, we work with partners to review, update or correct the affected content as quickly as possible. This collaborative approach helps us maintain a reliable experience for users while respecting the editorial ownership of our partners.
2. Accuracy and Verification
Correct information is the foundation of our editorial work. Articles, updates and published assets must be checked frequently as thoroughly as the format and timing allow.
Our teams aim to confirm:
facts, names, dates and competition details
scores, results, fixtures, standings and player information
quotes, statements and source attributions
statistics and background context
We prioritise credible and traceable sources, including:
official club, league, federation and tournament communications
direct interviews and press conferences
trusted wire services and rights-holding partners
reputable media outlets with a strong record of accuracy
verified data providers and official match information
We do not knowingly publish invented claims, fabricated quotes, false statistics or misleading source references. Information that cannot be confirmed to an acceptable editorial standard should not be presented as fact and always be connected with a source naming.
When information is still developing, we make that clear. When reporting on speculation, rumors or emerging stories, we label them appropriately and avoid overstating certainty.
3. Football Reporting Standards
Because OneFootball serves content as a platform to a global football audience, accuracy in football-specific reporting is especially important.
This includes care around:
transfer reporting and rumor aggregation
injury and squad availability updates
live match incidents and fast-moving breaking news
competition rules, disciplinary matters and officiating decisions
translations of statements from clubs, coaches, players and federations
Rumors, transfer interest and unconfirmed reports are not treated as established fact. We distinguish between:
confirmed news
credible reporting from external sources
market speculation or early-stage reporting
Where appropriate, we identify the origin of the information so readers can understand its status and context.
4. Human Responsibility for Published Content
Technology can support editorial work, but editorial accountability always remains with people.
Where appropriate human editors remain responsible for:
judging newsworthiness
checking factual accuracy
reviewing wording and context
ensuring fairness and clarity
approving final publication for Original content
AI tools may assist parts of the workflow, but they do not replace editorial judgment.
5. Responsible Use of AI
OneFootball may use AI-supported tools to improve speed, scale and efficiency in selected parts of the content process. These tools are designed to support our teams, not to replace editorial standards.
AI may be used for tasks such as:
transcription support
language assistance and translation support
summarisation of source material
headline, SEO title and metadata drafting
text structuring or formatting support
support in templated or data-led content production
AI must not be used to:
invent facts, quotes, results or statistics
create fake sources or false attribution
present assumptions as verified reporting
misrepresent events, people or outcomes
AI-assisted output intended for publication is subject to human review and, where needed, rewriting, verification and approval before it goes live.
6. AI and Fact Correctness
Accuracy standards apply equally to manually written and AI-assisted content. Editors are expected to challenge, verify and correct AI-assisted material.
This is especially important in football journalism, where errors can spread quickly around:
transfer news
player availability
match facts
competition regulations
translated statements
historical comparisons and statistics
If an AI-supported process cannot meet our verification standards for a given use case, that process should not be used for publication.
7. Language, Clarity and Readability
We aim to publish journalism that is easy to understand, precise and engaging for a broad football audience.
Our content should be:
clear without being simplistic
confident without exaggeration
energetic without becoming sensational
accessible to international readers
We prefer direct language, strong structure and concise paragraphs. Technical terms, tactical language or competition-specific references should be explained when needed. We avoid unnecessary jargon and do not use misleading or exaggerated wording simply to drive clicks.
Headlines, push texts, summaries and social copy must reflect the actual substance of the story.
8. Editorial Independence and Ethics
Trust depends on clear editorial boundaries. OneFootball expects original work, fair attribution and transparency in all areas of publishing.
We do not accept:
plagiarism
hidden sponsorship
manipulated sourcing
undisclosed conflicts of interest
Commercial partnerships, sponsored formats and branded content must be clearly identified. Editorial decisions should not be distorted by undisclosed outside influence.
We also respect legal, contractual and professional obligations, including embargoes, licensing restrictions and confidentiality commitments where applicable.
9. Fairness, Inclusion and Respect
Football is global, diverse and deeply cultural. Our editorial output should reflect that responsibly.
We strive to use language that is respectful, inclusive and accurate. We aim to avoid stereotypes, unnecessary bias and reductive framing. Coverage should reflect the breadth of the football world across leagues, regions, communities and perspectives.
This does not require neutralising strong reporting. It requires reporting with care, context and fairness.
10. Corrections and Updates
Even with strong editorial processes, mistakes can happen. When they do, we correct them clearly and without delay. Where issues with third-party partners content are reported or detected, we work with partners to review, update or correct the affected content as quickly as possible. This collaborative approach helps us maintain a reliable experience for users while respecting the editorial ownership of our partners.
Corrections may include:
factual fixes
clarifications
updated context in fast-moving stories
headline changes where wording created a false impression
We take credible reader feedback seriously and review reported issues promptly.
11. Editorial Review Process
OneFootball as a content platform works with external partners who publish content directly to our platform through native delivery integrations. Responsibility for the original accuracy of that content remains with the respective publishing partner. Before publication of our in-house content, it may go through several layers of review depending on format, timing and risk level.
These stages can include:
editorial commissioning or assignment
structural review
fact-checking and sourcing review
language and style editing
final publication approval
For fast-moving live coverage or short-form publishing, the workflow may be leaner, but accuracy and accountability still apply.
Editors also review whether:
the headline is accurate and not misleading
the framing matches the evidence in the story
visuals support the reporting appropriately
source attribution is sufficient
the piece meets OneFootball’s tone and quality standards
12. Images, Video and Visual Integrity
Visual elements must support understanding, not distort it.
Photos, graphics, clips and other media used by OneFootball are properly licensed, sourced or otherwise cleared for editorial use. We do not use visuals in a way that materially misleads the audience about what happened.
If AI-generated visuals are ever used in editorial environments, they should be applied only under clear internal standards, reviewed by editors and labeled where appropriate. AI visuals must never be used in a way that causes readers to mistake generated imagery for authentic documentary material.
13. Digital Publishing Standards
OneFootball publishes for digital audiences across app, web and other platforms. Editorial quality includes usability as well as accuracy.
We aim to ensure published content is:
mobile-friendly
easy to scan and navigate
clearly structured
optimised for search and discovery without becoming misleading
accessible through good formatting and appropriate text alternatives where relevant
SEO, metadata and platform optimisation are intended to improve discoverability, not to distort editorial meaning.
14. Our Approach to Trust
OneFootball’s editorial mission is to inform and serve football fans with content they can rely on. Speed matters in football media, but speed does not excuse avoidable errors. Innovation matters too, but innovation does not remove human responsibility.
We will continue to use technology where it improves workflows and helps our teams do better journalism. We will also continue to apply human judgment, verification and editorial care to the content we publish.
Questions or Feedback
If you believe a published item contains an error, requires clarification or raises an editorial concern, please contact OneFootball through the appropriate support or contact channels listed on our website.
https://company.onefootball.com/contact/